Skip to content
Venation.
Contact us

The evidence layer for security & compliance teams

Know what to prepare for. Know how to respond.

Venation turns threats relevant to your organisation into practical exercises, response playbooks and clear next steps, delivered through the tools your team already uses.

Talk to an analyst Contact Venation

Have a scenario, concern or question? That's enough to get started.

54 seconds

Trusted where being wrong is expensive

  • Randstad logo
  • Verizon logo
  • AXA XL logo
  • SWIFT logo
  • ANWB logo
  • CCV from Fiserv logo
  • NetSPI logo
I stopped forwarding threat reports to my team. Dedicated scenarios now arrive in our channel already sorted, and the audit trail writes itself.
Edoardo Gerosa
Edoardo GerosaCISO at Sherpany

One platform. Your workflows.

Guidance where your team already works.

Real-world threat scenarios, expert analysis and clear next steps, delivered through the tools your team uses every day, with human analysts when you need them.

Explore a scenario
Venation analyst

Supplier compromise

A supplier with privileged access to production systems could be compromised. Venation connects this scenario to your organisation's environment and identifies what should be validated next.

Why it matters
A critical supplier has privileged access to production systems, creating a potential route into your environment.
Key gap
Supplier access controls, monitoring and response readiness need validation.
Next step
Review the recommended actions and run a supplier access validation exercise.
Discuss with an analyst

Portal

The full scenario and evidence picture.

Integration

In the channels your team already uses.

API / MCP

Connect to your own tools and workflows.

Knowing what could happen is not enough. Your team needs to understand its exposure and what to do about it.

  1. Information overload

    More reports do not make the next decision clearer.

  2. No shared risk logic

    Teams need to know which threats matter and why.

  3. Evidence comes too late

    Reasoning should support the response, not be rebuilt afterwards.

  1. Many signals and sources

  2. Fewer, relevant scenarios

  3. Clear decisions and evidence

Three layers of Venation terrain: many threat signals at the top, fewer relevant scenarios in the middle, and clear decisions with supporting evidence at the bottom.

For entities with threat-led testing requirements

Your threat intelligence report was accurate on the day it arrived.

Every threat-led test starts with a Targeted Threat Intelligence report. Weeks of analyst work, a set of scenarios, and a PDF. Then the test runs, the report is filed, and the threat landscape carries on without it. At the next cycle, someone builds it again from scratch. We have a better way.

Today · one test cycle

  1. TTI report delivered
  2. Test performed
  3. Report rebuilt from scratch

Report filed, scenarios age, nothing updates (≈ 10 months)

With Venation · the same cycle

Scenarios reviewed every 90 days

Updated within 5 working days of a material change

The next test starts from something that is already current

The same obligation, a different unit of purchase. You are already buying threat intelligence on a test cycle; we keep it alive between the cycles instead of rebuilding it at each one.

The report you already buy. Current all year.

What we deliver

The work is done once and lands many times.

  • scenarios
  • threat actors
  • evidence

structured, versioned, reviewed

platform core

agentic + human analysts

One source, delivered to

  • Slack
  • Teams
  • WhatsApp
  • MCP
  • Portal

  1. Curation

    Scenarios, threat actors and evidence.

  2. Distribution

    One core, with agents and human analysts.

  3. Integration

    The same guidance in your existing workflow.

A useful first conversation.

Bring us a scenario, concern or question. We’ll help you explore what it could mean for your organisation.

Talk through a scenario Contact Venation